Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8642 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Политрук 2.0 | Telegram Webview: pltrk/19779 -
Ровно год, получается. И — с именным посвящением, обратим 🔼🔼🔼 внимание.
Как мы (не чураясь мистицизма "Розы Мира") любим повторять, "Жругр — очень трудный эгрегор, он жрёт тех, кто к нему инвольтирует. Есть лишь один способ с гарантией уберечь от атак Жругра тылы — не иметь их".
Ровно год, получается. И — с именным посвящением, обратим 🔼🔼🔼 внимание.
Как мы (не чураясь мистицизма "Розы Мира") любим повторять, "Жругр — очень трудный эгрегор, он жрёт тех, кто к нему инвольтирует. Есть лишь один способ с гарантией уберечь от атак Жругра тылы — не иметь их".
Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from ms