Ну наконец, ЮИТ купил Эталон за слезы - 4,6 ярда. Даже не верится, что эти шаромыжники наконец покинут рынок.
Вот что делает кризис животворящий. Ждём пресс-релизы на тему, как валятся другие ребята, которые с рынка все уходят, уходят и все никак не уйдут - такие есть😏
Ну наконец, ЮИТ купил Эталон за слезы - 4,6 ярда. Даже не верится, что эти шаромыжники наконец покинут рынок.
Вот что делает кризис животворящий. Ждём пресс-релизы на тему, как валятся другие ребята, которые с рынка все уходят, уходят и все никак не уйдут - такие есть😏
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford.
from ms
