Простите, но я не стану комментировать сей спич, и оспаривать ничего не стану. Видимо, это одно из лиц Судьбы, а с Судьбой не спорят. Ее принимают, как неизбежность. Аминь.
Простите, но я не стану комментировать сей спич, и оспаривать ничего не стану. Видимо, это одно из лиц Судьбы, а с Судьбой не спорят. Ее принимают, как неизбежность. Аминь.
BY Лев Вершинин
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai.
from ms
