💥🚨🖕НИЧЕГО-ТО НЕТ НА МНЕ! — ВСЕ БОГАТСТВА — НА РОДНЕ!
Арестованный за взятки глава ГИБДД по Тюменской обл. Александр Селюнин заявил, что не владеет никаким имуществом. 💰Особняк за 30 млн руб. - записан на родителей, все иномарки - на жену. А на Toyota Land Cruiser (ездит 18-летний сын) - вообще стоят номера правительства Тюмени. Да с такими номерами и деньги-то не нужны..! ̶Н̶а̶д̶о̶ ̶в̶ы̶п̶у̶с̶к̶а̶т̶ь̶ ̶ Надо понять логику полковника. ☝️Ну, зачем Селюнин с такой крутой роднёй так рисковал на проклятых взятках? 👀Всё же было у семьи..)
💥🚨🖕НИЧЕГО-ТО НЕТ НА МНЕ! — ВСЕ БОГАТСТВА — НА РОДНЕ!
Арестованный за взятки глава ГИБДД по Тюменской обл. Александр Селюнин заявил, что не владеет никаким имуществом. 💰Особняк за 30 млн руб. - записан на родителей, все иномарки - на жену. А на Toyota Land Cruiser (ездит 18-летний сын) - вообще стоят номера правительства Тюмени. Да с такими номерами и деньги-то не нужны..! ̶Н̶а̶д̶о̶ ̶в̶ы̶п̶у̶с̶к̶а̶т̶ь̶ ̶ Надо понять логику полковника. ☝️Ну, зачем Селюнин с такой крутой роднёй так рисковал на проклятых взятках? 👀Всё же было у семьи..)
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from ms
