В новом номере электронного журнала Лиterraтура – новое "Пятикнижие Родионова". На этот раз в обзор вошли такие книги: "Восьмидесятый градус" (Е. Попова), "Свидетели игр" (С. Гридасов, М. Крылова, Ю. Сапрыкин), "Путешествие Лейлы" (Д. Жанси), "Забытые войны России (А. Волынец), "Лес на карантине" (М. Эверстов).
В новом номере электронного журнала Лиterraтура – новое "Пятикнижие Родионова". На этот раз в обзор вошли такие книги: "Восьмидесятый градус" (Е. Попова), "Свидетели игр" (С. Гридасов, М. Крылова, Ю. Сапрыкин), "Путешествие Лейлы" (Д. Жанси), "Забытые войны России (А. Волынец), "Лес на карантине" (М. Эверстов).
Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp.
from ms
