🇷🇺🇺🇦@UAVDEV публикует уникальные кадры перехвата видео с украинского fpv камикадзе, который подвешен на дрон-носитель.
Помимо этого запечатлен также сход беспилотника и его полёт. Сам носитель выполнен по схеме вертикального взлёта и посадки и имеет нормальную оптику для обнаружения цели.
Благодаря такой связке украинские квадрокоптеры могут достигать бóльших дистанций. Однако точно неизвестно является ли дрон-матка в том числе и ретранслятором, так как разглядеть его особо не получилось.
🇷🇺🇺🇦@UAVDEV публикует уникальные кадры перехвата видео с украинского fpv камикадзе, который подвешен на дрон-носитель.
Помимо этого запечатлен также сход беспилотника и его полёт. Сам носитель выполнен по схеме вертикального взлёта и посадки и имеет нормальную оптику для обнаружения цели.
Благодаря такой связке украинские квадрокоптеры могут достигать бóльших дистанций. Однако точно неизвестно является ли дрон-матка в том числе и ретранслятором, так как разглядеть его особо не получилось.
The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from ms
