Год еще не закончился, а мы уже открываем запись на курсы Академии Музея Победы в январе!🔥
Программа «Современные тенденции развития музея как фактор сохранения культурного наследия общества» пройдет с 20 по 24 января 2025 года.
❓Для кого — музейных специалистов, музеологов, культурологов, представителей научных, образовательных и культурно-выставочных центров, специалистов по связям с общественностью.
ℹ️Подробнее о содержании курса можно узнать на сайте Академии.
Год еще не закончился, а мы уже открываем запись на курсы Академии Музея Победы в январе!🔥
Программа «Современные тенденции развития музея как фактор сохранения культурного наследия общества» пройдет с 20 по 24 января 2025 года.
❓Для кого — музейных специалистов, музеологов, культурологов, представителей научных, образовательных и культурно-выставочных центров, специалистов по связям с общественностью.
ℹ️Подробнее о содержании курса можно узнать на сайте Академии.
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. For tech stocks, “the main thing is yields,” Essaye said. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from us
