Therefore, the third, and indeed instrumental, cause of justification is faith, which makes that which was alien by acquisition, become proper by application.
29.This faith, therefore, is considered in two ways: first, absolutely, and in itself, as a certain virtue, habit, and quality; then, relatively, as it regards the promise, looking to Christ as its correlate and object. 30.In its first sense, the power of justification cannot be attributed to faith. In this respect, it is only the work of one commandment of the Decalogue, namely the first; whereas for the justification of man, the fulfillment of not just one but all commandments are required. 31.Furthermore, since it is imperfect when considered in itself, in this regard it rather needs the mercy of God to cover its imperfection than to merit the mercy of God. 32.Thirdly, because even if it were absolutely perfect, it would still be owed, as it is commanded by the law. However, what we are obligated to by debt cannot merit anything before God.[92] 33.Faith justifies insofar as it is considered relatively, or as it looks outside itself to Christ, embraces Him, and apprehends Him.
35.From this, it is clearly evident that faith in justification, as such, regards nothing in man, such that it does not even regard itself, but wholly turns man away from everything in him to Christ alone, as the sole and unique Redeemer of the human race. 36.Therefore, Paul also says that faith is imputed to us for righteousness.[93] Not on account of its own condition, quality, or merit, but on account of the dignity of the one it apprehends. Just as a ring is said to be worth hundreds of gold coins because of the gem it contains, not because the ring itself is worth so much on its own, but because of the gem, which is far nobler and most excellent.
Hunnius, Aegidius. Propositions on the Principal Articles of the Christian Religion: which in this Troubled Age of Ours are Drawn into Controversy (pp. 108-109). Smalkald Press. Kindle Edition.
Therefore, the third, and indeed instrumental, cause of justification is faith, which makes that which was alien by acquisition, become proper by application.
29.This faith, therefore, is considered in two ways: first, absolutely, and in itself, as a certain virtue, habit, and quality; then, relatively, as it regards the promise, looking to Christ as its correlate and object. 30.In its first sense, the power of justification cannot be attributed to faith. In this respect, it is only the work of one commandment of the Decalogue, namely the first; whereas for the justification of man, the fulfillment of not just one but all commandments are required. 31.Furthermore, since it is imperfect when considered in itself, in this regard it rather needs the mercy of God to cover its imperfection than to merit the mercy of God. 32.Thirdly, because even if it were absolutely perfect, it would still be owed, as it is commanded by the law. However, what we are obligated to by debt cannot merit anything before God.[92] 33.Faith justifies insofar as it is considered relatively, or as it looks outside itself to Christ, embraces Him, and apprehends Him.
35.From this, it is clearly evident that faith in justification, as such, regards nothing in man, such that it does not even regard itself, but wholly turns man away from everything in him to Christ alone, as the sole and unique Redeemer of the human race. 36.Therefore, Paul also says that faith is imputed to us for righteousness.[93] Not on account of its own condition, quality, or merit, but on account of the dignity of the one it apprehends. Just as a ring is said to be worth hundreds of gold coins because of the gem it contains, not because the ring itself is worth so much on its own, but because of the gem, which is far nobler and most excellent.
Hunnius, Aegidius. Propositions on the Principal Articles of the Christian Religion: which in this Troubled Age of Ours are Drawn into Controversy (pp. 108-109). Smalkald Press. Kindle Edition.
BY Diet of Worms
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. As the war in Ukraine rages, the messaging app Telegram has emerged as the go-to place for unfiltered live war updates for both Ukrainian refugees and increasingly isolated Russians alike. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety.
from nl
