Разве ты не видел тех мунафиков, которые утверждают, что они уверовали в то, что ниспослано тебе и что ниспослано до тебя, и в то же время они хотят обращаться за судом к тагуту, а хотя им приказано не веровать в него?
Забавно как этот мракобес - мучитель, требует у парня Лии Заирбековой принять ислам, хотя сам в трудную минуту обратился не к богу, а к гонителю мусульман Рамзану Кадырову, как настоящий тагут и мунафик.
Разве ты не видел тех мунафиков, которые утверждают, что они уверовали в то, что ниспослано тебе и что ниспослано до тебя, и в то же время они хотят обращаться за судом к тагуту, а хотя им приказано не веровать в него?
Забавно как этот мракобес - мучитель, требует у парня Лии Заирбековой принять ислам, хотя сам в трудную минуту обратился не к богу, а к гонителю мусульман Рамзану Кадырову, как настоящий тагут и мунафик.
Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. After fleeing Russia, the brothers founded Telegram as a way to communicate outside the Kremlin's orbit. They now run it from Dubai, and Pavel Durov says it has more than 500 million monthly active users. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from nl
