Николаев — бандеровцы из 133 бригдаты ТРО ЗСУ умоляют Зеленского вернуть им репутацию после того, как они бежали из под Угледара и стрельнули своего комбата, что бы тот им не мешал драпать.
Гои показывают Кагалу, что у них хуцпа не меньше, чем у фюрера. Только вот они забыли, что фюрер их сгноить может, а они его — нет
Николаев — бандеровцы из 133 бригдаты ТРО ЗСУ умоляют Зеленского вернуть им репутацию после того, как они бежали из под Угледара и стрельнули своего комбата, что бы тот им не мешал драпать.
Гои показывают Кагалу, что у них хуцпа не меньше, чем у фюрера. Только вот они забыли, что фюрер их сгноить может, а они его — нет
In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. Andrey, a Russian entrepreneur living in Brazil who, fearing retaliation, asked that NPR not use his last name, said Telegram has become one of the few places Russians can access independent news about the war. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from nl
