Записал подкаст о философии Аристотеля почти на 200 минут с аристотелеведом и прекрасным философом Артемом Юнусовым. Рецепт по записи огромного подкаста по философии незамысловат - нужно просто прерывать беседу двух философов работой перфоратора и тогда они буду говорить бесконечно. Во-первых, прошу прощения. Во-вторых, смотрите таймкоды и увеличивайте скорость воспроизведения. Внутри самого подкаста скрыт отдельный подкаст об этике добродетели. Спасибо большое всем, кто включит! И еще больше тем, кто подписывается, комментирует и тыкает на пальчики! https://youtu.be/M3DXGm_mOqg
Записал подкаст о философии Аристотеля почти на 200 минут с аристотелеведом и прекрасным философом Артемом Юнусовым. Рецепт по записи огромного подкаста по философии незамысловат - нужно просто прерывать беседу двух философов работой перфоратора и тогда они буду говорить бесконечно. Во-первых, прошу прощения. Во-вторых, смотрите таймкоды и увеличивайте скорость воспроизведения. Внутри самого подкаста скрыт отдельный подкаст об этике добродетели. Спасибо большое всем, кто включит! И еще больше тем, кто подписывается, комментирует и тыкает на пальчики! https://youtu.be/M3DXGm_mOqg
Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from nl
