Вообще я не в первый раз встречаю именно такую критику автофикшена: «обиженные пишут о том, как их все обижают». Хочется проследить историю этого мнения, понять, к какой книге оно восходит. Но я уверена, что впервые озвучено оно было на фейсбуке.
Вообще я не в первый раз встречаю именно такую критику автофикшена: «обиженные пишут о том, как их все обижают». Хочется проследить историю этого мнения, понять, к какой книге оно восходит. Но я уверена, что впервые озвучено оно было на фейсбуке.
BY creative woman
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender.
from nl
