В Новокузнецке жительница открыла приют для крыс. Декоративных. Называет их «ребятишки» и «мои дети». В арендованной квартире. Их больше сотни. Зарегистрировала НКО.
🔺А что, так можно? Разводить крыс в квартире многоэтажки, и под это зарегистрировать юрлицо в чужой квартире. За что получить федеральную премию «Экопозитив» на радость "счастливым" соседям.
🔻В старые времена, человека, называющего крыс своими детьми, лечили бы в дурке.
В Новокузнецке жительница открыла приют для крыс. Декоративных. Называет их «ребятишки» и «мои дети». В арендованной квартире. Их больше сотни. Зарегистрировала НКО.
🔺А что, так можно? Разводить крыс в квартире многоэтажки, и под это зарегистрировать юрлицо в чужой квартире. За что получить федеральную премию «Экопозитив» на радость "счастливым" соседям.
🔻В старые времена, человека, называющего крыс своими детьми, лечили бы в дурке.
BY Ecoloh news
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from nl
