Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8790 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Emigration for action | Telegram Webview: emigrationforaction/2674 -
Мы закончили её вот такой романтичной встречей под звёздами с телескопом. Посмотрели на Луну, Сатурн, Юпитер – и послушали рассказы про космос от нашего волонтёра Глеба.
Теперь мы уходим подводить итоги акции, но не прощаемся, потому что скоро вернёмся с важными новостями. Просим вас оставаться на связи и говорим огромное спасибо за вашу поддержку 💙
Мы закончили её вот такой романтичной встречей под звёздами с телескопом. Посмотрели на Луну, Сатурн, Юпитер – и послушали рассказы про космос от нашего волонтёра Глеба.
Теперь мы уходим подводить итоги акции, но не прощаемся, потому что скоро вернёмся с важными новостями. Просим вас оставаться на связи и говорим огромное спасибо за вашу поддержку 💙
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from nl
