Последствия не очень романтичные: отменено 220 авиарейсов, около 90 паромов прекратили движение, а улицы Сеула превратились в ледяной каток, вызвав серьёзные пробки. Зима, в общем, началась ярко 🌨️☃️
Последствия не очень романтичные: отменено 220 авиарейсов, около 90 паромов прекратили движение, а улицы Сеула превратились в ледяной каток, вызвав серьёзные пробки. Зима, в общем, началась ярко 🌨️☃️
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children.
from nl
