Если честно, Путин всегда казался человеком слишком мягким и в какой-то мере адекватным даже для центральной фигуры идеологии бушизма-путинизма формата 2008-2020. Что уж говорить о постбушизме, закрепленном в Конституции 2020 года. По этой причине выбор "либерального" (в трактовке современной шизополитологии) преемника для режима, подготавливающего нормативную базу под правую диктатуру как-то не очень вписывается в понимание. ЗЫ. Немножко серокожего.
Если честно, Путин всегда казался человеком слишком мягким и в какой-то мере адекватным даже для центральной фигуры идеологии бушизма-путинизма формата 2008-2020. Что уж говорить о постбушизме, закрепленном в Конституции 2020 года. По этой причине выбор "либерального" (в трактовке современной шизополитологии) преемника для режима, подготавливающего нормативную базу под правую диктатуру как-то не очень вписывается в понимание. ЗЫ. Немножко серокожего.
BY Наивная политология
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from nl
