— Милый, расскажи мне сказку. — Давным-давно в далёкой-далёкой стране все верстальщики знали правила переносов. — Это не сказка — это целая легенда! — Не, легенда — это где их знали ещё и корректоры. 😂
— Милый, расскажи мне сказку. — Давным-давно в далёкой-далёкой стране все верстальщики знали правила переносов. — Это не сказка — это целая легенда! — Не, легенда — это где их знали ещё и корректоры. 😂
BY Се ливер 🐸
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from nl
