Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8832 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Краевой Заседатель | Telegram Webview: krazased/1182 -
«Бориса Владимировича Мельниченко, кстати, чем дальше – тем невозможнее слушать. Коммерческий интерес в его пламенных речах видно невооруженным глазом, а он даже не стесняется», – сообщали ранее уважаемые коллеги.
Собственно, вот и цитата:
«Итог 22 года: официально опять снижение [на] 7000 молочных коров». Сочувствуем, Борис Владимирович.
«Бориса Владимировича Мельниченко, кстати, чем дальше – тем невозможнее слушать. Коммерческий интерес в его пламенных речах видно невооруженным глазом, а он даже не стесняется», – сообщали ранее уважаемые коллеги.
Собственно, вот и цитата:
«Итог 22 года: официально опять снижение [на] 7000 молочных коров». Сочувствуем, Борис Владимирович.
Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from nl
