В России очень легко отделить зерна от плевел в законодательной сфере. Инициативы, исходящие от Путина или даже косвенно связанные с ним, никогда не встречают никакого сопротивления.
Поэтому выборы в России - дорогостоящая бюрократия. При демократии подобная ситуация невозможна.
В России очень легко отделить зерна от плевел в законодательной сфере. Инициативы, исходящие от Путина или даже косвенно связанные с ним, никогда не встречают никакого сопротивления.
Поэтому выборы в России - дорогостоящая бюрократия. При демократии подобная ситуация невозможна.
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Telegram was founded in 2013 by two Russian brothers, Nikolai and Pavel Durov.
from nl
