🔝ХЛЕБНЁМ ЩИ ПО-ЕДИНОРОСОВСКИ..? и ладно бы щи, а то...
▪️70% жителей края, не нашедших времени аж за целых три дня прийти и проголосовать, однозначно будут жить в тех же условиях, что и те люди, которые сочли нужным это сделать. Оствшееся меньшинство уже своим большинством выбрало кандидатов от партии, которая и в Хабаровске не может навести порядок. А теперь им доверили огромный край.
🔝ХЛЕБНЁМ ЩИ ПО-ЕДИНОРОСОВСКИ..? и ладно бы щи, а то...
▪️70% жителей края, не нашедших времени аж за целых три дня прийти и проголосовать, однозначно будут жить в тех же условиях, что и те люди, которые сочли нужным это сделать. Оствшееся меньшинство уже своим большинством выбрало кандидатов от партии, которая и в Хабаровске не может навести порядок. А теперь им доверили огромный край.
Ну что? Хлебнём ВСЕ ВМЕСТЕ по полной?
BY МАКСИМум ПРАВДЫ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Andrey, a Russian entrepreneur living in Brazil who, fearing retaliation, asked that NPR not use his last name, said Telegram has become one of the few places Russians can access independent news about the war. "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from nl
