Это не честность, это маркетинг. За много букафф в фальшивых рецензиях платить перестали, пытается продать себя новым хозяевам в качестве «политического кинокритика». Ну и палит всех, конечно. Бывшие подельники теперь расходники. Особенно те, кто – остались, затаились и молчат.
Это не честность, это маркетинг. За много букафф в фальшивых рецензиях платить перестали, пытается продать себя новым хозяевам в качестве «политического кинокритика». Ну и палит всех, конечно. Бывшие подельники теперь расходники. Особенно те, кто – остались, затаились и молчат.
These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from nl
