Многие «рискованные» вещи на самом деле вполне безопасны. И многие «безопасные» вещи на самом деле рискованны. Например, оставаться на «безопасной» корпоративной работе на самом деле может быть очень рискованно.
Многие «рискованные» вещи на самом деле вполне безопасны. И многие «безопасные» вещи на самом деле рискованны. Например, оставаться на «безопасной» корпоративной работе на самом деле может быть очень рискованно.
#Понравилось
BY Максим Спиридонов
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read."
from nl
