⚡️После поста про Таню Лазареву с канала ушло почти пятьдесят человек. Наши ряды очищаются и я очень этому рад! Если бы еще с моего Фейсбука сгинули все ватники... Пусть уходят, а мы с вами продолжим изучать интересности испанского языка и испанской истории! @my_spain_kislov
⚡️После поста про Таню Лазареву с канала ушло почти пятьдесят человек. Наши ряды очищаются и я очень этому рад! Если бы еще с моего Фейсбука сгинули все ватники... Пусть уходят, а мы с вами продолжим изучать интересности испанского языка и испанской истории! @my_spain_kislov
BY Испания моя - España mía 🇪🇸
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from nl
