📣📣📣📣📣Друзья, если вы в Запорожской области стали очевидцем:
🔔ЧРЕЗВЫЧАЙНОГО ПРОИСШЕСТВИЯ.
🚗 ДТП.
🥊 КОНФЛИКТА.
🧱 ИЗМЕНЕНИЙ В ГОРОДЕ.
🤔 ПРОСТО ИНТЕРЕСНЫХ СОБЫТИЙ.
И успели зафиксировать это событие на камеру? 📷 Присылайте интересную информацию нам в бот @ActuallyinZaporozhye_bot и мы опубликуем её на нашем канале!
📣📣📣📣📣Друзья, если вы в Запорожской области стали очевидцем:
🔔ЧРЕЗВЫЧАЙНОГО ПРОИСШЕСТВИЯ.
🚗 ДТП.
🥊 КОНФЛИКТА.
🧱 ИЗМЕНЕНИЙ В ГОРОДЕ.
🤔 ПРОСТО ИНТЕРЕСНЫХ СОБЫТИЙ.
И успели зафиксировать это событие на камеру? 📷 Присылайте интересную информацию нам в бот @ActuallyinZaporozhye_bot и мы опубликуем её на нашем канале!
The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from nl
