«Голубцы». Капусту на ночь кидаю на балкон. Потом размораживаю, убираю жилки. В фарш вместо риса добавляю хлопья. Формирую голубцы. С двух сторон «поджариваются» на сухой сковородке. Перекладываю в сотейник, добавляю тертую морковь, заливаю подливой и тушу около 1 часа. Подлива-смешиваю кетчуп, сметану, теплую воду и столовую ложку муки.
«Голубцы». Капусту на ночь кидаю на балкон. Потом размораживаю, убираю жилки. В фарш вместо риса добавляю хлопья. Формирую голубцы. С двух сторон «поджариваются» на сухой сковородке. Перекладываю в сотейник, добавляю тертую морковь, заливаю подливой и тушу около 1 часа. Подлива-смешиваю кетчуп, сметану, теплую воду и столовую ложку муки.
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. However, the perpetrators of such frauds are now adopting new methods and technologies to defraud the investors. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from nl