I am making this poast for every channel admin and owner.
After years of service to ur frens and followers, I just want to say, thank you.
You have trudged thru information for the masses. Put urselves in a vulnerable situation no matter how much u did to protect urself. And you did it for the TRUTH.
I am making this poast for every channel admin and owner.
After years of service to ur frens and followers, I just want to say, thank you.
You have trudged thru information for the masses. Put urselves in a vulnerable situation no matter how much u did to protect urself. And you did it for the TRUTH.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from nl
