Очередной выпуск дипломированных координаторов PSYOP!
Растим защитников информационного пространства, что позволит нам в скором времени в корне сменить подход к нашему участию в информационной войне, и перейти от стратегии пассивной обороны к активной наступательной контратаке!
Очередной выпуск дипломированных координаторов PSYOP!
Растим защитников информационного пространства, что позволит нам в скором времени в корне сменить подход к нашему участию в информационной войне, и перейти от стратегии пассивной обороны к активной наступательной контратаке!
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. 'Wild West' In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts.
from nl
