🤓Внезапно Окко (участник экосистемы Сбера) было заблокировано Мининформом Беларуси.
Что конкретно произошло не ясно. Формально поводом для блокировки стало, как утверждается, нарушение закона о СМИ, в частности размещение на сервисе «запрещенной информации, направленной на пропаганду насилия и жестокости». 😙Постмаркетинг. Подпишись — ибо грядет!
🤓Внезапно Окко (участник экосистемы Сбера) было заблокировано Мининформом Беларуси.
Что конкретно произошло не ясно. Формально поводом для блокировки стало, как утверждается, нарушение закона о СМИ, в частности размещение на сервисе «запрещенной информации, направленной на пропаганду насилия и жестокости». 😙Постмаркетинг. Подпишись — ибо грядет!
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War."
from nl
