Похороны цыган за 10 млн рублей показали курганские ритуальщики. Прощаются с усопшим с размахом: гроб до кладбища везут на Майбахах или Мерседесах. Покойнику сооружают подземный склеп, напоминающий квартиру с мраморной отделкой. В нём размещают любимые напитки усопшего — бутылки с ромом, вином, чтобы его душа могла выпить на том свете. @retailrus
Похороны цыган за 10 млн рублей показали курганские ритуальщики. Прощаются с усопшим с размахом: гроб до кладбища везут на Майбахах или Мерседесах. Покойнику сооружают подземный склеп, напоминающий квартиру с мраморной отделкой. В нём размещают любимые напитки усопшего — бутылки с ромом, вином, чтобы его душа могла выпить на том свете. @retailrus
In this regard, Sebi collaborated with the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to reduce the vulnerability of the securities market to manipulation through misuse of mass communication medium like bulk SMS. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. During the operations, Sebi officials seized various records and documents, including 34 mobile phones, six laptops, four desktops, four tablets, two hard drive disks and one pen drive from the custody of these persons. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from nl
