В Японии совсем не попадался по пути джимичу, чтобы посмотреть ту самую коллабу с сейлормун — а тут пожалуйста, самый главный вожделенный айтем ждал меня (но не мой кошелёк). Вообще в тех же самых магазинах тут заметно больше блестящего, чем в японских
В Японии совсем не попадался по пути джимичу, чтобы посмотреть ту самую коллабу с сейлормун — а тут пожалуйста, самый главный вожделенный айтем ждал меня (но не мой кошелёк). Вообще в тех же самых магазинах тут заметно больше блестящего, чем в японских
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion.
from nl