Дмитрий Балакин (на видео) хотел убить друга из ревности к женщине. Он купил четыре градусника и залил ртуть в пирожки, которые подсунул своему другу Сергею Г., когда они были в кафе. Сам же симулировал отравление, чтобы отвести подозрения.
Возбуждено уголовное дело о покушении на убийство.
Дмитрий Балакин (на видео) хотел убить друга из ревности к женщине. Он купил четыре градусника и залил ртуть в пирожки, которые подсунул своему другу Сергею Г., когда они были в кафе. Сам же симулировал отравление, чтобы отвести подозрения.
Возбуждено уголовное дело о покушении на убийство.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram Messenger Blocks Navalny Bot During Russian Election He adds: "Telegram has become my primary news source." On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from nl
