"In Norwegen wird eine Bitcoin-Farm nach Bürgerprotesten geschlossen. Folge: Der Strompreis vor Ort steigt. Die Bitcoin-Farm trug nämlich dazu bei, die Stromnetze zu entlasten. Norwegen bezieht einen großen Teil seines Stroms aus erneuerbaren Energiequellen, für die Netze ist das eine große Herausforderung."
"In Norwegen wird eine Bitcoin-Farm nach Bürgerprotesten geschlossen. Folge: Der Strompreis vor Ort steigt. Die Bitcoin-Farm trug nämlich dazu bei, die Stromnetze zu entlasten. Norwegen bezieht einen großen Teil seines Stroms aus erneuerbaren Energiequellen, für die Netze ist das eine große Herausforderung."
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from nl
