Раді вітати вдома нашу збірну, яка повернулася з Invictus Games Vancouver Whistler 2025 у Канаді. Українські військовослужбовці та ветерани вибороли 32 медалі:🥇12 золотих 🥈11 срібних 🥉9 бронзових
Ми пишаємося побратимами, які гідно представили Україну на світовій арені:
Ваш приклад — це символ неймовірної мотивації, стійкості та здатності долати найскладніші виклики. Бажаємо нових звершень та безмежної сили духу на кожному кроці!
Раді вітати вдома нашу збірну, яка повернулася з Invictus Games Vancouver Whistler 2025 у Канаді. Українські військовослужбовці та ветерани вибороли 32 медалі:🥇12 золотих 🥈11 срібних 🥉9 бронзових
Ми пишаємося побратимами, які гідно представили Україну на світовій арені:
Ваш приклад — це символ неймовірної мотивації, стійкості та здатності долати найскладніші виклики. Бажаємо нових звершень та безмежної сили духу на кожному кроці!
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from nl
