Гости из Азербайджана осваивают на Васильевском суммарно почти миллиард, а "результат" такой, что в советское время ставили бы к стенке.
Ну а администрация Василеостровского района шлёт подальше даже задающий вопросы 78 канал, входящий в холдинг, где главная, вообще-то, - Алина Кабаева.
◼️Этот сюжет стоит посмотреть для понимания механизма того как такая беда происходит, как на все вопросы подрядчики из сопредельного государства нагло шлют журналистов лесом, общаясь как в шашлычной.
Гости из Азербайджана осваивают на Васильевском суммарно почти миллиард, а "результат" такой, что в советское время ставили бы к стенке.
Ну а администрация Василеостровского района шлёт подальше даже задающий вопросы 78 канал, входящий в холдинг, где главная, вообще-то, - Алина Кабаева.
◼️Этот сюжет стоит посмотреть для понимания механизма того как такая беда происходит, как на все вопросы подрядчики из сопредельного государства нагло шлют журналистов лесом, общаясь как в шашлычной.
It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from nl
