«Мыли посуду от крови и мочи и покупали аквариумных рыбок начальнику»
В 2021 году мать и дочь Елену и Викторию Лыскович осудили по брестскому «хороводному делу». Суд приговорил женщин к полутора годам ограничения свободы с направлением — то есть к «химии». Там осужденные живут в общежитиях под присмотром милиционеров и выходят на работу — как правило тяжелую и с низкой оплатой — в свободный мир. Лысковичи рассказали «Медиазоне», как работали в больнице и в цеху по производству шнурков.
«Мыли посуду от крови и мочи и покупали аквариумных рыбок начальнику»
В 2021 году мать и дочь Елену и Викторию Лыскович осудили по брестскому «хороводному делу». Суд приговорил женщин к полутора годам ограничения свободы с направлением — то есть к «химии». Там осужденные живут в общежитиях под присмотром милиционеров и выходят на работу — как правило тяжелую и с низкой оплатой — в свободный мир. Лысковичи рассказали «Медиазоне», как работали в больнице и в цеху по производству шнурков.
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from nl
