Вот уж не думали, что можем быть в чём-то солидарны с поуехавшим «некогда подающим надежды» режиссёром Александром Молочниковым. Вот эти малохольные и малограмотные куклы, которые звонят по «базе», вообще не врубаясь, кому и зачем. И ведь репутационная подстава всей этой Зарайской администрации и министерству культуры Зарайска, которые либо наняли «модное московское агентство», либо даже не в курсе этой инициативе. Но вообще, эти лохушки с нулевой аналитикой в голове - бич проектов любого уровня.
Вот уж не думали, что можем быть в чём-то солидарны с поуехавшим «некогда подающим надежды» режиссёром Александром Молочниковым. Вот эти малохольные и малограмотные куклы, которые звонят по «базе», вообще не врубаясь, кому и зачем. И ведь репутационная подстава всей этой Зарайской администрации и министерству культуры Зарайска, которые либо наняли «модное московское агентство», либо даже не в курсе этой инициативе. Но вообще, эти лохушки с нулевой аналитикой в голове - бич проектов любого уровня.
BY Закулиска
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
However, the perpetrators of such frauds are now adopting new methods and technologies to defraud the investors. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from nl
