Главред «Инсайдера» Роман Доброхотов (признан иноагентом) подтвердил нашу информацию о Невзлине. Весной Невзлин же слил письмо Леонида Волкова (признан иноагентом) в защиту Михаила Фридмана, о чем мы тоже писали. https://www.group-telegram.com/nl/zhabaigaduka.com/1714
Главред «Инсайдера» Роман Доброхотов (признан иноагентом) подтвердил нашу информацию о Невзлине. Весной Невзлин же слил письмо Леонида Волкова (признан иноагентом) в защиту Михаила Фридмана, о чем мы тоже писали. https://www.group-telegram.com/nl/zhabaigaduka.com/1714
"And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel.
from nl
