"Военнослужащий, применивший физическую силу к сослуживцам воинской части, дислоцированной в Республике Тыва, задержан и помещен под стражу", - цитирует представителя ЦВО URA.RU.
Собеседник интернет-агентства добавил, что в отношении мужчины возбуждено уголовное дело. Обстоятельства инцидента выясняют комиссия Минобороны РФ и правоохранительные органы. Виновных пообещали привлечь к ответственности.
Вот и хорошо. Ждем храбреца в первых рядах штурмовых отрядов, пусть с таким же задором бьется с врагом.
"Военнослужащий, применивший физическую силу к сослуживцам воинской части, дислоцированной в Республике Тыва, задержан и помещен под стражу", - цитирует представителя ЦВО URA.RU.
Собеседник интернет-агентства добавил, что в отношении мужчины возбуждено уголовное дело. Обстоятельства инцидента выясняют комиссия Минобороны РФ и правоохранительные органы. Виновных пообещали привлечь к ответственности.
Вот и хорошо. Ждем храбреца в первых рядах штурмовых отрядов, пусть с таким же задором бьется с врагом.
This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from nl
