Therefore, the third, and indeed instrumental, cause of justification is faith, which makes that which was alien by acquisition, become proper by application.
29.This faith, therefore, is considered in two ways: first, absolutely, and in itself, as a certain virtue, habit, and quality; then, relatively, as it regards the promise, looking to Christ as its correlate and object. 30.In its first sense, the power of justification cannot be attributed to faith. In this respect, it is only the work of one commandment of the Decalogue, namely the first; whereas for the justification of man, the fulfillment of not just one but all commandments are required. 31.Furthermore, since it is imperfect when considered in itself, in this regard it rather needs the mercy of God to cover its imperfection than to merit the mercy of God. 32.Thirdly, because even if it were absolutely perfect, it would still be owed, as it is commanded by the law. However, what we are obligated to by debt cannot merit anything before God.[92] 33.Faith justifies insofar as it is considered relatively, or as it looks outside itself to Christ, embraces Him, and apprehends Him.
35.From this, it is clearly evident that faith in justification, as such, regards nothing in man, such that it does not even regard itself, but wholly turns man away from everything in him to Christ alone, as the sole and unique Redeemer of the human race. 36.Therefore, Paul also says that faith is imputed to us for righteousness.[93] Not on account of its own condition, quality, or merit, but on account of the dignity of the one it apprehends. Just as a ring is said to be worth hundreds of gold coins because of the gem it contains, not because the ring itself is worth so much on its own, but because of the gem, which is far nobler and most excellent.
Hunnius, Aegidius. Propositions on the Principal Articles of the Christian Religion: which in this Troubled Age of Ours are Drawn into Controversy (pp. 108-109). Smalkald Press. Kindle Edition.
Therefore, the third, and indeed instrumental, cause of justification is faith, which makes that which was alien by acquisition, become proper by application.
29.This faith, therefore, is considered in two ways: first, absolutely, and in itself, as a certain virtue, habit, and quality; then, relatively, as it regards the promise, looking to Christ as its correlate and object. 30.In its first sense, the power of justification cannot be attributed to faith. In this respect, it is only the work of one commandment of the Decalogue, namely the first; whereas for the justification of man, the fulfillment of not just one but all commandments are required. 31.Furthermore, since it is imperfect when considered in itself, in this regard it rather needs the mercy of God to cover its imperfection than to merit the mercy of God. 32.Thirdly, because even if it were absolutely perfect, it would still be owed, as it is commanded by the law. However, what we are obligated to by debt cannot merit anything before God.[92] 33.Faith justifies insofar as it is considered relatively, or as it looks outside itself to Christ, embraces Him, and apprehends Him.
35.From this, it is clearly evident that faith in justification, as such, regards nothing in man, such that it does not even regard itself, but wholly turns man away from everything in him to Christ alone, as the sole and unique Redeemer of the human race. 36.Therefore, Paul also says that faith is imputed to us for righteousness.[93] Not on account of its own condition, quality, or merit, but on account of the dignity of the one it apprehends. Just as a ring is said to be worth hundreds of gold coins because of the gem it contains, not because the ring itself is worth so much on its own, but because of the gem, which is far nobler and most excellent.
Hunnius, Aegidius. Propositions on the Principal Articles of the Christian Religion: which in this Troubled Age of Ours are Drawn into Controversy (pp. 108-109). Smalkald Press. Kindle Edition.
BY Diet of Worms
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Telegram was co-founded by Pavel and Nikolai Durov, the brothers who had previously created VKontakte. VK is Russia’s equivalent of Facebook, a social network used for public and private messaging, audio and video sharing as well as online gaming. In January, SimpleWeb reported that VK was Russia’s fourth most-visited website, after Yandex, YouTube and Google’s Russian-language homepage. In 2016, Forbes’ Michael Solomon described Pavel Durov (pictured, below) as the “Mark Zuckerberg of Russia.” Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information.
from no
