Так, что даже не стоит выезжать за пределы населенных пунктов. По крайней мере, именно об этом попросил жителей Владимир Севастьянов, главный госавтоинспектор Башкирии.
На открытых участках трасс низовая метель, а по республике — сильный снегопад. Повод посидеть дома и пересмотреть всю киноклассику, пока не надоест)
Так, что даже не стоит выезжать за пределы населенных пунктов. По крайней мере, именно об этом попросил жителей Владимир Севастьянов, главный госавтоинспектор Башкирии.
На открытых участках трасс низовая метель, а по республике — сильный снегопад. Повод посидеть дома и пересмотреть всю киноклассику, пока не надоест)
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from no
