قال ابنُ رجبٍ ـ رحمه الله ـ: «وإنَّما ذَلَّ المؤمنُ ـ آخِرَ الزمان ـ لغُربتِه بين أهل الفساد مِنْ أهل الشُّبُهات والشهوات؛ فكُلُّهم يكرهه ويُؤذِيهِ؛ لمُخالَفةِ طريقته لطريقتهم، ومقصودِه لمقصودهم، ومُبايَنَتِه لِمَا هم عليه»
قال ابنُ رجبٍ ـ رحمه الله ـ: «وإنَّما ذَلَّ المؤمنُ ـ آخِرَ الزمان ـ لغُربتِه بين أهل الفساد مِنْ أهل الشُّبُهات والشهوات؛ فكُلُّهم يكرهه ويُؤذِيهِ؛ لمُخالَفةِ طريقته لطريقتهم، ومقصودِه لمقصودهم، ومُبايَنَتِه لِمَا هم عليه»
«كشف الكربة» لابن رجب رحمه الله (١١)
BY خواطري
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been a driving force in markets for the past few weeks. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care.
from no
