Смольнинский районный суд г. Санкт-Петербурга рассмотрел представление начальника филиала по Всеволожскому району ЛО ФКУ УИИ УФСИН России по г. СПб и ЛО об изменении меры пресечения Валерию Израйлиту с домашнего ареста на заключение под стражу.
27.10.2020 Израйлиту были установлены мобильное контрольное устройство и электронный браслет. 16.11.2020 при снятии отчета по подконтрольным лицам СЭМПЛ у Израйлита было выявлено нарушение расписания присутствия электронного браслета в периоды времени: 12.11.2020 с 3.50 до 04.11; 13.11.2020 с 8.18 до 8.37; 14.11.2020 с 01.11 до 01.26, 01.42 до 01.59, 12.29 до 12.46, 23.12 до 00.03; 15.11.2020 с 00.41 до 01.25, 02.21 до 03.10, 07.37 до 08.02, 21.06 до 21.34.
Суд решил - неубедительно, и в удовлетворении представления отказал.
Израйлит пояснил, что сидел дома, никуда не выходил, браслет был при нем.
Смольнинский районный суд г. Санкт-Петербурга рассмотрел представление начальника филиала по Всеволожскому району ЛО ФКУ УИИ УФСИН России по г. СПб и ЛО об изменении меры пресечения Валерию Израйлиту с домашнего ареста на заключение под стражу.
27.10.2020 Израйлиту были установлены мобильное контрольное устройство и электронный браслет. 16.11.2020 при снятии отчета по подконтрольным лицам СЭМПЛ у Израйлита было выявлено нарушение расписания присутствия электронного браслета в периоды времени: 12.11.2020 с 3.50 до 04.11; 13.11.2020 с 8.18 до 8.37; 14.11.2020 с 01.11 до 01.26, 01.42 до 01.59, 12.29 до 12.46, 23.12 до 00.03; 15.11.2020 с 00.41 до 01.25, 02.21 до 03.10, 07.37 до 08.02, 21.06 до 21.34.
Суд решил - неубедительно, и в удовлетворении представления отказал.
Израйлит пояснил, что сидел дома, никуда не выходил, браслет был при нем.
BY Объединённая пресс-служба судов Санкт-Петербурга
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website.
from no
