Внезапно. На "Активном гражданине" голосовалка по благоустройству в 2025-м детской площадки у входа во "Вкусвилл" (которую обещали, ой не соврать бы в 2020-м, потом её погрыз ковид, потом СВО, понос, золотуха и вот наконец...)
Внезапно. На "Активном гражданине" голосовалка по благоустройству в 2025-м детской площадки у входа во "Вкусвилл" (которую обещали, ой не соврать бы в 2020-м, потом её погрыз ковид, потом СВО, понос, золотуха и вот наконец...)
The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War."
from no
