Уж сколько лет твердили миру, то есть казахстанцам о предстоящем референдуме по строительстве АЭС, но оказывается слышали о нем лишь три четверти населения - 74,6%. При том, что опрос проводился в крупных городах, а не в отдаленных аулах. А пойдут голосовать и того меньше, всего 57%. Устали уже люди от этого словоблудия по поводу АЭС, вот и результат.
Уж сколько лет твердили миру, то есть казахстанцам о предстоящем референдуме по строительстве АЭС, но оказывается слышали о нем лишь три четверти населения - 74,6%. При том, что опрос проводился в крупных городах, а не в отдаленных аулах. А пойдут голосовать и того меньше, всего 57%. Устали уже люди от этого словоблудия по поводу АЭС, вот и результат.
This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from no
