Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Frederick Scrivener worked on the Revised Version 1881/RV. Philip Schaff & James Strong worked on the American Standard Version/ASV 1901 (The revised New Testament and History of revision: Giving a literal reprint of the Authorized English edition of the Revised New Testament, Pages 95, 106, 110), which led to all today's modern versions
Title Page Link)
Chapter IX Link
On James Strong - Page 110 Link, ON Philip Schaff - Page 106 Link & 107 Link [same Page 107 Link involves Scrivener as well].

Main Point - Here's a great reason to avoid James Strong's Concordance: Strong worked on the corrupt ASV/American Standard Version Old Testament Committee, which was corrupt & influenced by the 1881 Revised Version [which occultists Westcott & Hort worked on]+its underlying source text from Vaticanus+Sinaiticus! James Strong's ASV goes against the KJB & twists verses

Discard James Strong's ASV Strong's Concordance & RV 1881
Get, read, & believe the words of the KJB
Follow π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ @AntiModernVersions



group-telegram.com/antihebrewroots/401
Create:
Last Update:

Frederick Scrivener worked on the Revised Version 1881/RV. Philip Schaff & James Strong worked on the American Standard Version/ASV 1901 (The revised New Testament and History of revision: Giving a literal reprint of the Authorized English edition of the Revised New Testament, Pages 95, 106, 110), which led to all today's modern versions
Title Page Link)
Chapter IX Link
On James Strong - Page 110 Link, ON Philip Schaff - Page 106 Link & 107 Link [same Page 107 Link involves Scrivener as well].

Main Point - Here's a great reason to avoid James Strong's Concordance: Strong worked on the corrupt ASV/American Standard Version Old Testament Committee, which was corrupt & influenced by the 1881 Revised Version [which occultists Westcott & Hort worked on]+its underlying source text from Vaticanus+Sinaiticus! James Strong's ASV goes against the KJB & twists verses

Discard James Strong's ASV Strong's Concordance & RV 1881
Get, read, & believe the words of the KJB
Follow π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ @AntiModernVersions

BY 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 β„Œπ”’π”Ÿπ”―π”’π”΄ β„œπ”¬π”¬π”±π”°







Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/antihebrewroots/401

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

"And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie MarΓ©chal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. And while money initially moved into stocks in the morning, capital moved out of safe-haven assets. The price of the 10-year Treasury note fell Friday, sending its yield up to 2% from a March closing low of 1.73%. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Meanwhile, a completely redesigned attachment menu appears when sending multiple photos or vides. Users can tap "X selected" (X being the number of items) at the top of the panel to preview how the album will look in the chat when it's sent, as well as rearrange or remove selected media. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp β€œunless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from no


Telegram 𝔄𝔫𝔱𝔦 β„Œπ”’π”Ÿπ”―π”’π”΄ β„œπ”¬π”¬π”±π”°
FROM American