Не соглашусь с критиком Константином Мильчиным в оценке творчества Иванова. Такое ощущение, что между ними пробежала какая-то кошка в те времена, когда еще на Чусовой динозавры жили. https://gorky.media/context/po-unichtozhennoj-zemle/
Не соглашусь с критиком Константином Мильчиным в оценке творчества Иванова. Такое ощущение, что между ними пробежала какая-то кошка в те времена, когда еще на Чусовой динозавры жили. https://gorky.media/context/po-unichtozhennoj-zemle/
In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from no
