🇹🇷🇷🇺Выдвинутые Владимиром Путиным новые мирные предложенияявляются проблеском надежды, при этом конференция по Украине в Швейцарии была бы более результативной при участии российских представителей - глава МИД Турции
🇹🇷🇷🇺Выдвинутые Владимиром Путиным новые мирные предложенияявляются проблеском надежды, при этом конференция по Украине в Швейцарии была бы более результативной при участии российских представителей - глава МИД Турции
BY БЫСТРО
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from no