🦒🔥Более 200 животных погибли в горящем «Тропик парке» в Евпатории, сообщает зоопарк. Предварительной причиной возгорания стало короткое замыкание проводки холодильника.
Ситуацией заинтересовалась прокуратура, силовики выясняют все обстоятельства произошедшей трагедии.
🦒🔥Более 200 животных погибли в горящем «Тропик парке» в Евпатории, сообщает зоопарк. Предварительной причиной возгорания стало короткое замыкание проводки холодильника.
Ситуацией заинтересовалась прокуратура, силовики выясняют все обстоятельства произошедшей трагедии.
Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. In view of this, the regulator has cautioned investors not to rely on such investment tips / advice received through social media platforms. It has also said investors should exercise utmost caution while taking investment decisions while dealing in the securities market. NEWS "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from no