Максимальная наценка, которую может установить продавец в магазине, должна быть не больше 100% от цены производителя товара (от ввозной цены для импорта).
Сегодня потребительские цены на внутреннем рынке практически никак не регулируются. И этим могут воспользоваться все, кто угодно: от просто алчных барыг до вполне понятных деструктивных сил. Поэтому создание механизмов контроля за ценами — это вопрос национальной безопасности России.
Максимальная наценка, которую может установить продавец в магазине, должна быть не больше 100% от цены производителя товара (от ввозной цены для импорта).
Сегодня потребительские цены на внутреннем рынке практически никак не регулируются. И этим могут воспользоваться все, кто угодно: от просто алчных барыг до вполне понятных деструктивных сил. Поэтому создание механизмов контроля за ценами — это вопрос национальной безопасности России.
Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from no
