📌 Актывісты акцыі «Ультыматум» у дзень бязвыбараў у Беларусі правялі онлайн-мемныя выбары паміж Лукашэнкам-прусам і шпіцам BelDoge
🔻 У Варшаве пры свабодным волевыяўленні людзей BelDogе набраў каля 98 адсоткаў (149 галасоў), Лукашэнка-прусак – 0.65 адсоткаў – 1 голас, у Кёльне шпіц атрымаў аглушальную перамогу, 100 адсоткаў, пры поўным пройгрышы Лукашэнкі – прусака.
📌 Актывісты акцыі «Ультыматум» у дзень бязвыбараў у Беларусі правялі онлайн-мемныя выбары паміж Лукашэнкам-прусам і шпіцам BelDoge
🔻 У Варшаве пры свабодным волевыяўленні людзей BelDogе набраў каля 98 адсоткаў (149 галасоў), Лукашэнка-прусак – 0.65 адсоткаў – 1 голас, у Кёльне шпіц атрымаў аглушальную перамогу, 100 адсоткаў, пры поўным пройгрышы Лукашэнкі – прусака.
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images
from no
